Driven by the neo-liberal ethos of the time, the legislation was focused on opening up the rail network to competition, with very little emphasis on improving the lot of the passenger, facilitating investment, or (indeed) reducing costs.

Is it a quibble, or play upon words?

Could you file a bug at on the issue tracker with a minimum reproduction so that we can investigate?

[…] whatsoever the Father hath done in the Contrivance, or the Son hath done in the Accomplishment of our Redemption, is all inavailable, and ineffectual, to our Salvation, without this.