Last Updated:2025/12/06

The court decided that the tire blowout, while an intervening cause, was foreseeable and did not relieve the driver of liability for the pedestrian's injuries.

See correct answer

The court decided that the tire blowout, while an intervening cause, was foreseeable and did not relieve the driver of liability for the pedestrian's injuries.

音声機能が動作しない場合はこちらをご確認ください
Edit Histories(0)
Source Sentence

裁判所は、タイヤのバーストが介在原因であっても予見可能であり、歩行者の負傷について運転者の責任を免れるものではないと判断した。

Sentence quizzes to help you learn to read

Edit Histories(0)

Login / Sign up

 

Download the app!
DiQt

DiQt

Free

★★★★★★★★★★